| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Dollo's law of irreversibility ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Dollo's law of irreversibility
Dollo's law of irreversibility (also known as Dollo's law and Dollo's principle) is a hypothesis proposed in 1893〔Dollo, L (1893). (Les lois de l'évolution. ) ''Bull. Soc. Belge Geol. Pal. Hydr'', VII:164-166.〕 by French-born Belgian paleontologist Louis Dollo which states that evolution is not reversible. This hypothesis was first stated by Dollo in this way: "An organism is unable to return, even partially, to a previous stage already realized in the ranks of its ancestors."〔Dollo, quoted in "Evolution: Ammonites Indicate Reversal," in ''Nature'', March 21, 1970〕 The statement is often misinterpreted as a less stringent hypothesis regarding the likelihood of regain of lost structures or organ, which are unlikely to reappear in the (loosely defined) 'same form.' According to Richard Dawkins, the law is "really just a statement about the statistical improbability of following exactly the same evolutionary trajectory twice (or, indeed, any particular trajectory), in either direction." Stephen Gould viewed the idea less strictly, suggesting that "irreversibility" forecloses certain evolutionary pathways once broad forms have emerged: "(example ), once you adopt the ordinary body plan of a reptile, hundreds of options are forever closed, and future possibilities must unfold within the limits of inherited design."〔Gould, Stephen J. () (2007) "Eight little piggies," Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-09-950744-4〕
==An example==
A 2009 study on the evolution of protein structure proposed a new mechanism for Dollo's law. It examined a hormone receptor that had evolved from an ancestral protein that was able to bind two hormones to a new protein that was specific for a single hormone. This change was produced by two amino acid substitutions, which prevent binding of the second hormone. However, several other changes subsequently occurred, which were selectively neutral as they did not affect hormone binding. When the authors tried to revert the protein back to its ancestral state by mutating the two "binding residues", they found the other changes had destabilised the ancestral state of the protein. They concluded that in order for this protein to evolve in reverse and regain its ability to bind two hormones, several independent neutral mutations would have to occur purely by chance with no selection pressure. As this is extremely unlikely, it may explain why evolution tends to run in one direction.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Dollo's law of irreversibility」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|